Our Content Guidelines
All content featured on the Women’s Longevity Forum is carefully selected to support our mission of empowering women to master their health and maximize healthspan through Medicine 3.0 principles.
We prioritize:
- Evidence-based excellence: Material from recognized leaders in longevity, metabolism, preventive medicine, and women-specific health (e.g., Peter Attia, Andrew Huberman, Sara Gottfried, Stacy Sims, and peers of similar rigor).
- Primary scientific sources: Peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses, and consensus statements published in high-impact journals.
- Authoritative institutional research: Work originating from or endorsed by top-tier academic and medical institutions (Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Mayo Clinic, etc.).
- Recency and relevance: Preference for the most current, actionable insights that translate complex science into practical guidance for midlife and older women.
- Focus on female biology: Special emphasis on research and recommendations that account for hormonal transitions, menopause, sarcopenia, bone health, cardiovascular differences, and other women-specific factors often under-represented in general longevity content.
- Clarity and accessibility: Expert-level accuracy delivered in language that educated non-physicians can understand and immediately apply.
We exclusively curate existing, publicly available content that meets these standards; we do not create or commission original articles. Every piece is chosen because it moves women closer to becoming the CEO of their own longevity. No hype, no fads, only the highest-caliber information available today.